Folds: fix fold deduplication and improve start/stop logic

This commit is contained in:
Andrew He 2021-07-05 01:45:28 -07:00 committed by Thomas Vigouroux
parent dff252d32a
commit 901406cf7a

View file

@ -9,6 +9,13 @@ local M = {}
-- Especially not for every line in the file when `zx` is hit
local folds_levels = tsutils.memoize_by_buf_tick(function(bufnr)
local max_fold_level = api.nvim_win_get_option(0, "foldnestmax")
local trim_level = function(level)
if level > max_fold_level then
return max_fold_level
end
return level
end
local parser = parsers.get_parser(bufnr)
if not parser then
@ -23,22 +30,31 @@ local folds_levels = tsutils.memoize_by_buf_tick(function(bufnr)
end
end)
local levels_tmp = {}
-- start..stop is an inclusive range
local start_counts = {}
local stop_counts = {}
local prev_start = -1
local prev_stop = -1
for _, node in ipairs(matches) do
local start, _, stop, stop_col = node.node:range()
if stop_col > 0 then
stop = stop + 1
if stop_col == 0 then
stop = stop - 1
end
local should_fold = start + 1 < stop -- Only fold for 2+ lines
local fold_length = stop - start + 1
local should_fold = fold_length >= 2
-- This can be folded
-- Fold only multiline nodes that are not exactly the same as previously met folds
if should_fold and not (levels_tmp[start] and levels_tmp[stop]) then
levels_tmp[start] = (levels_tmp[start] or 0) + 1
levels_tmp[stop] = (levels_tmp[stop] or 0) - 1
-- Checking against just the previously found fold is sufficient if nodes
-- are returned in preorder or postorder when traversing tree
if should_fold and not (start == prev_start and stop == prev_stop) then
start_counts[start] = (start_counts[start] or 0) + 1
stop_counts[stop] = (stop_counts[stop] or 0) + 1
prev_start = start
prev_stop = stop
end
end
@ -48,21 +64,28 @@ local folds_levels = tsutils.memoize_by_buf_tick(function(bufnr)
-- We now have the list of fold opening and closing, fill the gaps and mark where fold start
for lnum = 0, api.nvim_buf_line_count(bufnr) do
local prefix = ""
local shift = levels_tmp[lnum] or 0
-- Determine if it's the start of a fold
if levels_tmp[lnum] and shift >= 0 then
local last_trimmed_level = trim_level(current_level)
current_level = current_level + (start_counts[lnum] or 0)
local trimmed_level = trim_level(current_level)
current_level = current_level - (stop_counts[lnum] or 0)
local next_trimmed_level = trim_level(current_level)
-- Determine if it's the start/end of a fold
-- NB: vim's fold-expr interface does not have a mechanism to indicate that
-- two (or more) folds start at this line, so it cannot distinguish between
-- ( \n ( \n )) \n (( \n ) \n )
-- versus
-- ( \n ( \n ) \n ( \n ) \n )
-- If it did have such a mechansim, (trimmed_level - last_trimmed_level)
-- would be the correct number of starts to pass on.
if trimmed_level - last_trimmed_level > 0 then
prefix = ">"
elseif trimmed_level - next_trimmed_level > 0 then
prefix = "<"
end
current_level = current_level + shift
-- Ignore folds greater than max_fold_level
if current_level > max_fold_level then
levels[lnum + 1] = max_fold_level
else
levels[lnum + 1] = prefix .. tostring(current_level)
end
levels[lnum + 1] = prefix .. tostring(trimmed_level)
end
return levels