benbot/nvim-treesitter
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter.git synced 2026-07-18 03:10:04 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
nvim-treesitter/queries/scala/locals.scm

53 lines
920 B
Scheme
Raw Normal View History

feat(scala): add in local variables queries This syncs the queries that were updated in https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-scala/pull/196. Co-authored-by: ghostbuster91 <ghostbuster91@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-03-27 06:54:26 +02:00
; Scopes
[
(template_body)
(lambda_expression)
fix: Correct scope definition for scala `@scope` included `function_declaration` while is should have included `function_definition` instead. The former one is used to declare abstract functions while the latter one is used to define functions together with their bodies.
2023-04-28 00:24:35 +02:00
(function_definition)
fix(scala): Add missing locals definitions for scala
2023-04-01 19:53:19 +02:00
(block)
fix(scala): add `for_expression` locals This change does two main things: 1. Indicate that `(for_expression)`'s introduce a `@scope` (this is the scope for the enumerators to be used within the loop). 2. Indicate that the `(identifiers)` within the `(enumerators)` are `@definition.var`s. --- For the following example snippet: ```scala val fruits = List("apple", "banana", "avocado", "papaya") val countsToFruits = fruits.groupBy(fruit => fruit.count(_ == 'a')) for ((count, fruits) <- countsToFruits) { println(s"with (fruits) 'a' × $count = $fruits") } ``` The `count` and `fruits` identifiers are new definitions introduced by the `for` expressions scope.
2023-10-15 14:43:34 -04:00
(for_expression)
feat(scala): add in local variables queries This syncs the queries that were updated in https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-scala/pull/196. Co-authored-by: ghostbuster91 <ghostbuster91@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-03-27 06:54:26 +02:00
] @scope
; References
(identifier) @reference
; Definitions
(function_declaration
name: (identifier) @definition.function)
(function_definition
fix(scala): ensure `function_definition` is in parent scope
2023-10-15 14:40:36 -04:00
name: ((identifier) @definition.function)
(#set! definition.var.scope parent))
feat(scala): add in local variables queries This syncs the queries that were updated in https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-scala/pull/196. Co-authored-by: ghostbuster91 <ghostbuster91@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-03-27 06:54:26 +02:00
(parameter
name: (identifier) @definition.parameter)
fix(scala): Add missing locals definitions for scala
2023-04-01 19:53:19 +02:00
(class_parameter
name: (identifier) @definition.parameter)
fix(scala): Mark (lambda_expression) without bindings as @defintition.parameters When you have a lambda expression like: ```scala val fruits = List("apple", "banana", "avocado", "papaya") val countsToFruits = fruits.groupBy(fruit => fruit.count(_ == 'a')) for ((count, fruits) <- countsToFruits) { println(s"with (fruits) 'a' × $count = $fruits") } ``` The `fruit => fruit.count(_ == 'a')` lambda expression (note: without wrapping parenthesis) does not create a `(binding)` node. Its syntax tree is: ``` (lambda_expression) ; [5:18 - 47] parameters: (identifier) ; [5:18 - 22] (call_expression) ; [5:27 - 47] function: (field_expression) ; [5:27 - 37] value: (identifier) ; [5:27 - 31] field: (identifier) ; [5:33 - 37] arguments: (arguments) ; [5:38 - 47] (infix_expression) ; [5:39 - 46] left: (wildcard) ; [5:39 - 39] operator: (operator_identifier) ; [5:41 - 42] right: (character_literal) ; [5:44 - 46] ``` That example just _happens_ to be **exactly** one of the example from https://www.scala-lang.org/ ([see playground](https://scastie.scala-lang.org/S0bkCiXkQiuOMXnlhWn46g)) 😁.
2023-09-08 16:02:29 -04:00
(lambda_expression
parameters: (identifier) @definition.var)
feat(scala): add in local variables queries This syncs the queries that were updated in https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-scala/pull/196. Co-authored-by: ghostbuster91 <ghostbuster91@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-03-27 06:54:26 +02:00
(binding
name: (identifier) @definition.var)
(val_definition
pattern: (identifier) @definition.var)
(var_definition
pattern: (identifier) @definition.var)
(val_declaration
name: (identifier) @definition.var)
(var_declaration
name: (identifier) @definition.var)
fix(scala): add `for_expression` locals This change does two main things: 1. Indicate that `(for_expression)`'s introduce a `@scope` (this is the scope for the enumerators to be used within the loop). 2. Indicate that the `(identifiers)` within the `(enumerators)` are `@definition.var`s. --- For the following example snippet: ```scala val fruits = List("apple", "banana", "avocado", "papaya") val countsToFruits = fruits.groupBy(fruit => fruit.count(_ == 'a')) for ((count, fruits) <- countsToFruits) { println(s"with (fruits) 'a' × $count = $fruits") } ``` The `count` and `fruits` identifiers are new definitions introduced by the `for` expressions scope.
2023-10-15 14:43:34 -04:00
(for_expression
enumerators: (enumerators
(enumerator
(tuple_pattern
(identifier) @definition.var))))
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink